May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a good alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream every time. It’s great for kids and Juul Pods for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, that was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. For that reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into your mouth, therefore you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco in to the marketplace.
Along with the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.